GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - For Newbies THE HISTORY OF IBILL short version

F-U-Jimmy · 07-09-2009, 01:21 PM

The Current owners of IBILL obviously purchased the name to make money, from the traffic that still flows from old links, and its old reputation of being the biggest and oldest on line processor. They didn't think the backlash from web-masters would be as strong as it is ? Therefore one can deduce that they purchased the name for its reputation and money making opportunities and for profit. If thats the case then there may be a cause of action for a class action law suite. Im not an attorney but it's a possibility ?

Secondly if you read the paragraph below you will see the statements that the current bank only rejects the word TEEN in a website which opens up a whole new avenue and opportunity for illegal scat sites, etc, etc. Putting you money at even more risk.

Also their bank is in the UK, im a Brit so I have access to people in the UK I dont think it will be hard to locate who they use. If they are new and so honest why on earth use a UK bank why not a bank in the USA?

"Brown said that investors scooped up iBill?s trademark after the defunct company let the name expire and then completed an acquisition for the iBill.net domain for $14,500 from an employee of the original processor (the old iBill used iBill.com as its URL).

The company currently services about 20 adult websites ( fools ) and more than 40 mainstream customers, using two accounts with a European payment processing company Brown wouldn?t disclose with the exception that it is near London. Oddly, that European processor has only one exclusion: any reference to ?teens? in websites"

07-09-2009, 01:21 PM
F-U-Jimmy Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Visiting a city near you soon ! Posts: 6,853	Here a a few more thoughts for your edification The Current owners of IBILL obviously purchased the name to make money, from the traffic that still flows from old links, and its old reputation of being the biggest and oldest on line processor. They didn't think the backlash from web-masters would be as strong as it is ? Therefore one can deduce that they purchased the name for its reputation and money making opportunities and for profit. If thats the case then there may be a cause of action for a class action law suite. Im not an attorney but it's a possibility ? Secondly if you read the paragraph below you will see the statements that the current bank only rejects the word TEEN in a website which opens up a whole new avenue and opportunity for illegal scat sites, etc, etc. Putting you money at even more risk. Also their bank is in the UK, im a Brit so I have access to people in the UK I dont think it will be hard to locate who they use. If they are new and so honest why on earth use a UK bank why not a bank in the USA? "Brown said that investors scooped up iBill?s trademark after the defunct company let the name expire and then completed an acquisition for the iBill.net domain for $14,500 from an employee of the original processor (the old iBill used iBill.com as its URL). The company currently services about 20 adult websites ( fools ) and more than 40 mainstream customers, using two accounts with a European payment processing company Brown wouldn?t disclose with the exception that it is near London. Oddly, that European processor has only one exclusion: any reference to ?teens? in websites" __________________ icq. 176240424 44.years as a pornographer !!!!!!!!!!!