Quote:
Originally Posted by borked
OK, I'm being naïve cos this kind of doesn't involve me, but if iBill (the rogues) went under and were liquidated, and part of that liquidation was selling of the domain name, then why does the new iBill have to answer/pay debts under the old iBill name?
Or is there something more sinister at work here (sorry only followed those ibill threads briefly at the beginning)
|
The "new Ibill" is owned and operated by the "old Ibill" executives, including one of the orginal founders. This has certainly lead to the belief that there is something sinister at work.
Cheyenne