View Single Post
Old 07-24-2009, 08:54 AM  
Machete_
WINNING!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by roly View Post
you cared enough to reply

if you get too many false positives you can turn down the heusteristic detection level, false positives are a play off against detection of unknown viruses, it's up to you but i've never found it a problem.

as far as being what some blog "told me to think" here's some results http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2008/09_02 compiled by independant AV testers http://www.av-test.org/ who i'm guessing have a little more knowledge on AV testing than you. out of that list of AV programs, avira came top for malware detection.

so what do you advise as the best?
I still dont give a fuck what you think, what those blogs and consumer websites tell you.

The most important ability in a security software, is the proactive ability. And AVIRA is simply not a secure software. In most cases it wont find the malware before the client PC is compromiced.

Avast is a good free alternative, and the only free anti-virus software I would reccomend people to install. But if you want a secure program, you need to pay

Last edited by Machete_; 07-24-2009 at 08:55 AM..
Machete_ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote