View Single Post
Old 07-25-2009, 07:36 AM  
wyldblyss
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Buck Starts Here
Posts: 5,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt View Post
there's no shame in having one of your photos on the cover of Time magazine but the emergence of what is called 'micro stock' is a financial blow for photographers, illustrators, artists - rather than spend thousands of dollars hiring a talented artist to design a CD cover big companies can browse micro stock agencies like iStockPhoto's website with hundreds of thousands of images and with a little Photoshop work produce a CD or book cover cover for a hundred dollars.

that is not good for the creative arts profession. it's a race to the bottom.
You are so right about that. I am one of those people that use istock but TIME doing it for their cover? If I was the photographer I would be in tears.
wyldblyss is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote