Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn
Some of Gideon's points are obvious things that everyone or nearly everyone does already- watermarking the content for example. Branding bugs are the same thing as a watermark essentially, right? I wouldn't call that a separate thing. Having a live component is indeed a good idea if one can do it, although not everyone can make that happen.
|
no one is doing watermarking right in this industry, everyone is using static watermarks. doing watermarks correctly is a lot more of science then just simply slapping your url on the video.
branding bugs is not the same thing as a watermark, it is closer to an info bug and that is significantly different.
if you can hire a girl to fuck on camera you can hire her to chat with the members after the scene airs for the first time. no one should have a problem adding a live component.
However no one is doing it correctly even when they have a live component to the site.
Quote:
|
However, product placement in adult is a non-starter. Who is going to pay for product placement in an internet porn video?
|
until you understand q-ratio and how to do a proper product placement, until you understand what makes a good product placement and a bad product placement.
if you don't know what you have to sell, no one is going to buy it.
Quote:
|
And this private tracker idea that you seem to be obsessed with is something that no one know or cares about. How exactly is using a private tracker for a torrent of any use to make someone money? Gideon seems to keep harping on that idea, but I really don't see the application of it.
|
setting up a private tracker is fulfulling the fair use right people have to use torrents for free. Once that fair use right is provided for fully, other trackers can't hide behind that fair use right.
if you can't see how getting rid of illegal copies can make you more money, there is nothing i can do for you.