07-28-2009, 11:33 AM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Behind The Lens
Posts: 6,323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
I have no dogs in this fight so I'm not taking sides, as I know nothing either way. I just have some questions and general statements based on the info I have read.
1) I find it a bit scary that people think you MUST test at AIM or you are being unprofessional or irresponsible. There are other places to get tested. This is the exact AIM brainwashing that people talk about.
2) I would think if a guy raped someone, she would press charges. Were rape charges pressed against this guy?
3) Why are there countless threads started about this guy? Isn't one enough? Is their any proof to anything other than his PAST history of getting into trouble?
4) Who cares if he runs/ran an escort company? Newsflash... girls who have sexy for money are HOOKERS, regardless if there is a camera in the room or not.
5) If any of this info IS true, how is he still working and getting girls? If it's not true, how are you guys not banned & sued yet?
|
I will take a shot at trying to answer these 
1) I assume AIM would be the first place producers would check to see if a performers testing is current. About the brainwashing...who knows.
2) I think you should ask Joe about that, beings he was the individual being accused of making the statement.
3) Probably should address the person that started this thread
4) Personally it's no big deal to me.
5) How do you know he is getting girls? I don't know his daily or weekly activities. If it's not true, then that remains to be seen. Banned and sued...who knows?
When you mention "you guys", I don't think I have posted anything that is worthy of a banning or to be sued for.
Hope that helps....make it a fantastic day 
__________________
Amateur Content ICQ: 292 356 077
|
|
|