View Single Post
Old 07-28-2009, 03:47 PM  
Smiley
Confirmed User
 
Smiley's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Somewhere Between Here & There
Posts: 1,265
im for paying if and only if Citi can say that they would of been a company without the bailout money....

if Citi didnt get bailed out....guess what no Citi and no bonus....maybe if they sold everything off and then paid him...but while all this money is being handed out to companies that would of failed without it, bonuses like this should be frozen...

we should be paid back first and foremost...in full with interest....then they should be able to look at the ppl that "made them money"...sorry but 100m as a bonus, the guy can certainly hold off a year, he aint broke....its no longer a contract thing...its just the moral thing to do...and here i am trying to preach morals to americans and big business...

if you signed a contract and that company went belly up....do you get your bonus? Citi only stayed afloat even after all this money this guy made for them by getting a hand out...we are paying his bonus, not citi....no different than all these companies claiming HUGE profits....its all because company A & B & C & D,,,got bail out money and then paid other companies they owed who also got bailout money....it was all a fake money changing hands to pay off debts until one giant got it all....its a sham..wow even...
__________________
NSCash
[email protected]

Smiley is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote