Quote:
Originally Posted by gwidomains
actually, "fair" is always a relative term -- the rich gain from more stability.
Also, for "fair tax" folks -- since it includes increases on capital gains, and elimination of a lot of tax breaks taxes on the super wealthy would actually go up.
Lastly, the tax burden on the super wealthy is the lowest and has been trending downward. That's why you are siting relative figures, as opposed to actual burden.
|
the top 1% are not the "super wealthy" and regardless of the relativity of "fair" 1% paying for 95% is not just unfair, its wrong.
it allows the 95% to be fiscally irresponsible until the country is run into the ground