View Single Post
Old 08-02-2009, 05:19 PM  
IllTestYourGirls
Ah My Balls
 
IllTestYourGirls's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under the gold leaf ICQ 388-454-421
Posts: 14,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boobzooka View Post
I'm not sure 250K-500K is "rich", but if you're talking theoretically about who can afford to shoulder national tax requirements, then it's a reasonable place to start squeezing a little.

In America, the top 10% owns 70%-90% of the nations wealth. The reason for the wide range I'm quoting is because it's easy to manipulate statistics depending on what you include or omit, so that covers the most conservative to most liberal interpretations.

The top 5% hold more than the remaining 95% of citizens, yet this group only covers about half of America's taxes. That's a steal.

The bottom 40% owned less than 1%. IMO none of these people should pay any income tax.

What every message board tax thread reveals is the mass ignorance of the working population about true wealth distribution in this country, comical perceptions of what rich is, and generally poor math skills with no ability to conceptualize the consequences of numbers.
I only said 250 to 500 because that is what Obama has been said to think is rich.
__________________
IllTestYourGirls is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote