Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn
Gideon, your points are bogus as usual. I defy you to point out a single instance of legitimate fair use of any piece of adult media. I don't mean a hypothetical case, I am talking about a real instance you can point to online somewhere. It simply doesn't happen. Anyone and everyone using adult photo or video content without permission from the owner is simply avoiding to pay for it and/or helping others to do so for entertainment, status or profit. I can understand the many legitimate cases of fair usage in the mainstream for parody or news reporting or creative derivative works comprised of prior works and other cases. But those are never the case in the adult world.
|
so let me get this straight you expect to walk into a court of law and say
your honor i know you guys have already ruled that content producers don't have a right to licience away "timeshifting" by claiming that they only licience it on "a specific day at a specific time" but you should let us do it because we produce porn.
it amazing how you keep pointing to mainstream victories by the riaa and talking about precedent they set and don't see how all those case set precedents against you also.
if you want an example of such an extention in porn
mrskin.com
btw that is an amazing far reaching one because not only does he cover his actions by commentary but he actually charges for accessing the "unauthorized use" or more accurately fair use authorized use.