Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn
Mr. Skin isn't a porn site nor has porn content. The whole first part of your argument made no sense at all. I was asking about fair use in adult and you haven't come up with an example yet. Your agenda is like one of those religious nuts that starts with a weird conclusion like the earth is 4,000 years old and then works backwards to find "facts" or some twisted logic to reinforce their silly pre-determined conclusion. What's your interest in all of this anyway? Do you just want to see everything given away for free? Like I said before, there isn't a single case of fair use going on in the adult world. It's just a bunch of cheapskates and scofflaws who are taking advantage.
|
oh and mrskin example is exactly on point with this issue.
Mutt is complaining that brazzers took a single image from a video and presents it in their advertising material without the permission of the creator
mr skin not only takes a clip of the nudity and SELLS access to it without the permission of the creator. He puts those images in banners as well.
your insanely stupid arguement is that mr skin is not porn so his actions are ok, but brazzers actions are porn so the fair use protection doesn't apply anymore.