Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
|
so how are torrents / newsgroups / tubes (just the illegal stuff) / whatever covered by this clause in your deluded brain...
are they posting full un edited works for criticism?
comment?
news reporting?
teaching?
scholorship?
research?
parody?
anything at all? besides making sales - to profit from their fraudulant use of copyrighted works in their entirety?
enlighten me here - how do you use this section to justify their actions?
how do you equate what is being done, with what should be fair use as defined in your quote?
.
__________________
believe me - without free porn, just as many people will seek porn out on the Internet, and many more will pay if there is no free alternative, its not like sex is a fad - it can be milked much like any renewable resource - long term
i wasn't born with enough middle fingers
- Marilyn Manson