Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
lol
If gideongallery isn't on the payroll of some torrent site to do this on GFY then he is missing out on a nice source of revenue.
I'm sure that his posts are sources of laughter at piracy sites worldwide when he comes over here and stirs the hornets nest. 
Have fun whiile you can gideongallery. But in the last few months it's been JAIL for a few pirates. You're communist dreamworld is crashing down.
But I have to admit I enjoy laughing at you. You really think you know what's going to happen and have consulted with a "lawyer"
Riiiiggghhht. I don't think you've ever hired a lawyer in your life. |
well i am surprise you think i am so intelligent that i would get so many ruling right.
side by side every time we have argued about a legal point i have been right and you have been wrong.
you believed that parody required me to dress up in a wig and pretend to be claudia marie
i said it would apply to something as simple as changing the sound track to the song "internet killed the porno star" or in the case of your wife "legal flabby and old " (parody of snows song legal tender and fine).
eff successfully got a change in subtitles to be explictly recognized as parody.
i tell you it because a lawyer tells me so, you think it because i am some type of super genius.
Quote:
Reality is that nobody in adult is going to change what is happening. No judge is going to be sympathetic to a guy in the porn biz anyway. Hell, if I went to legal battle over it...they'd probably find some way to throw me in jail.
But the same can't be said for the other things being pirated. You know change is coming. Which is why you make these insane postings and ramblings about "clouds" and "safe harbor" and "private trackers"
|
have to agree with this no porn company is ever going successfully get the copyright laws extended in the way you want them too.
Quote:
The law isn't clear yet. It isn't in synch with the internet. You can babble about Supreme Court rulings on "clouds" and anything else you want. But in reality there have been NO such rulings. You are just interpreting old rulings to read the way you want to.
Just like a fanatic reads the Bible and interprets it to fit their view.
|
i have provided you direct links to the ruling so only a complete moron would claim there is no such ruling.
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/victory-dvrs-cloud
Quote:
Twenty-four years ago in the Sony Betamax case, the Supreme Court declared that using a VCR to "time-shift" — to record a television program for viewing at a later time — was a fair use. Today, the Second Circuit rejected [PDF] an attempt by the content industry to change the rules of the game if your video recorder is stored "in the cloud" on the Internet.
In March 2006, Cablevision announced that it would be launching a "remote storage" DVR (RS-DVR) system that would operate much like a TiVo, except that the recordings would be stored on hard drives in Cablevision buildings rather than on a box under a consumer's television. A collection of studios and networks sued Cablevision, arguing that RS-DVRs would violate copyright.
When a consumer presses the record button on a remote control, it's the consumer who's making the copy, regardless of whether the copy is being stored on a hard drive a few feet away, or in a data center miles away. Although the district court agreed with the plaintiffs, the appellate court today resoundingly sided with Cablevision, EFF, and the other amici that supported Cablevision:
|
i suggest you actually read the ruling to see before you claim it doesn't exist.
Quote:
Soon the law will be changed to get rid of this gray area. And then we will see. Maybe you are right and I'll end up mowing your lawn and washing your car. And you'll have Bill Gates as your butler, and Hollywood movie studio heads will tend your garden.
But somehow I think that the amount of money and the impact this is having on an already hurt worldwide economy is going to prevail. The current situation is a travesty against hard working people and IS stealing. Double talk all you want. Hide all you want and hope that a VCR ruling from decades ago really will be the final say.
|
again that was the exact same arguement that the mpaa made when the vcr won the right to exist.
The laws had to change because it would be the death of the industry if they didn't
Those evil device had to be outlawed, stopped at the border
yet the porn industry (real creativity not your copycat creativity) put the stuff on the tapes and sold it. The mainstream industry copied that innovation and home viewing market became the greatest source of revenue ever.
As one of those people who actually comes up with innovative ideas, i am sure you will copy those ideas too. remember you were saying that mainstream type product placement would never work in porn until you "creatively"
came up with the idea to copy wayne's world.