Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
look man. this just needs to be said. you're a dumb human being. i read your posts and i openly admit that they make me dumber. i really try not to read things you post.
i'm not a domainer but you're talking about some very basic, easy to understand shit.
"countries" don't do or control anything. the owner of the tld does.. which may or may not be an organization with a government affiliation. Verisign owns .com/.net and they aren't a country or government run. .aero is not owned by a country. etc etc etc etc.
.xxx is just a proposed tld. ICAAN can only approve it or deny it. they can't create it and determine/control it's use.. or legislate/demand a tld be used a certain way... its use, registration/ownership process etc is determined by the owner of the tld... much less have any authority to enforce such an idea world wide.
stop blowing the already embarrassingly low IQ curve of this board. your fucking it up for some dumb - but quite likable people that only tolerated because they are likable.
 |
Before you talk about dumbness, at least improve your reading skills, your knowledge, and learn to spell ICANN. Don't blame me, for making you dumber...
I talk about
levels - NOT role of ICANN. Administration and police of such mandatory domain will require a new organization... OR a change of existing organizations. Shall I repeat it again??
And YES, some countries DO control or restrict the access or use of
country code domain levels. For instance in Denmark, you can not register a .dk domain with anonymous whois. In Norway, you can not register .no without having a registered company or organization.
These are just few examples, and with a top-level organization, the same idea CAN be introduced worldwide.
I do not hope it happens, but I think it will.