Quote:
Originally Posted by harvey
I'm not sure if I'm understanding well, but the parameter would be sites that gets little traffic, hence they deserve more? If so, maybe there's a reason. I mean, there are at least 3 sites in that list that converted like crap in not-so-hard times, can't even imagine how they'll convert today. Then again, not sure if I'm understanding well
|
Exactly... based on who's reviews exactly? The one or two surfers who actually took the time to write an actual review (I hardly think so..), or was it paid reviews, or affiliates putting in the review...
Although I like where this thread is going and this is a great start, still some more work to do in filtering out the sites that seriously don't do so well.
