09-02-2009, 04:41 AM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Istanbul - Turkiye
Posts: 3,179
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Dane
The intention was to filter CP sites, like they do in Scandinavia and UK, but they admitted during a hearing that 1/3 of the websites were not CP but "young adults". I am not sure which sites are on their list now, but I know paysites like teendreams.com, teenflood.com, and the diesel/brothersincash/teenmegacash sites was on their censorlist. The australian abbywinters.com was also on their list, including many promoters websites. So basically; censorship.
Same shit happened in Scandinavia, where some fewer "young adults" but legal sites were censored. I think they revised their lists. But the process is outrageous imo, how can you label a website and the site owner like that without any proof or court?
|
So there is no any social rights organizations gos to lawsuit against it?  
|
|
|