Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay
So wrong. They had images of LV products that violated copyright and the host refused to do anything about it.
It's the same principal.
|
re read the case, they were found guilty for the trademark violation not the copyright violations.
if anything this is a bad ruling for you.
putting up copyrighted image lv bag, side by side with the fake bag to prove how close they were was not ruled to be a violation. even when the host ignores takedown requests.
i think that lv cede the point and choose not to fight on that arguement-- at least based on what i saw about the case, but if i am wrong and the copyright picture issue was considered by the judge and jury (as you claimed) then above point is valid.