Quote:
|
Court heard Brinacomb's face was blurred out so he could not be identified, although you could see his tattoo on his back, and the victim's face was clearly visible.
|
Too funny, and reminds me of a story.
I was in a court holding cell awaiting arraignment with a bunch of felons. The DA was taking people one at a time offering settlement agreements in exchange for a guilty plea.
One guy was very cocky. After all, he had held up a gas station on Halloween, so was wearing a costume. There was no way they could identify his as the perp . . . . or so he thought.
He came back a few minutes later, rather dejected.
Apparently the DA offered him a deal and he turned it down. The DA offered again, saying they had video of the robbery, so was he positive he did not want to accept the deal.
No deal.
The DA then showed him the video where his face was indeed covered. What he forgot was that he was wearing a wife-beater which exposed the huge tattoo going across his shoulders . . . with his nickname.