View Single Post
Old 09-09-2009, 11:15 AM  
dyna mo
The People's Post
 
dyna mo's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: invisible 7-11
Posts: 64,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmcfadden View Post
i'm kinda looking for debunking on the below listed... specifically 149, 150 and 167



? Page 149: Any employer with a payroll of $400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays an 8% tax on payroll.


? Page 150: Any employer with a payroll of $250K-400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays a 2 to 6% tax on payroll.

? Page 167: Any individual who doesn't have acceptable healthcare (according to the government) will be taxed 2.5% of income.

149/150- not accurate. the penalty isn?t incurred if an employer "does not offer the public option," as the e-mail claims. Rather, it?s a penalty for not offering health insurance to employees.

167- true. This is the mechanism in the bill to enforce the individual mandate requiring everyone to have insurance. A person who doesn?t have insurance that meets minimum benefit standards (or other acceptable coverage, such as a plan that was grandfathered in) would pay a penalty of 2.5 percent of modified adjusted gross income for the year. The total penalty can?t exceed a national average premium for individual coverage, or family coverage if applicable.
dyna mo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote