|
That idea that Federer had only weak opponents before Nadal is what confirm that Federer is so good. The distance between he and the rest of players is so big that NONE though that playing tennis in that way were possible, and he does it in times where the speed of the game is huge.
Those who really have a sense of the tennis history say that Federer is the number one of the modern age, no doubt about that, hard to find someone who really know about tennis (and play it, of course) who can say the opposite. Those who knows so much about tennis history say that Federer could compete with Rod Laver for the best of the history, but of course no Sampras.
|