View Single Post
Old 09-18-2009, 11:02 AM  
eZe
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 360
Quote:
Originally Posted by split_joel View Post
Are people really that naive though? I mean I understand most people just agree with what they hear but at what point do people say enough with the bullshit? It is scary for someone my age who has one child and will be having more in the future knowing the kind of world they are growing up in.
Yes people are this gullible. The game is the get the emotional label/frame into the main stream media. Everytime the label is heard or spoken in CREATES neural pathways that trigger an emotional reaction. REGARDLESS of its truth.

take "War on Terror" come on.... really???? I saw it on TV it must be true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
Something that the Republican party does so much better than the Democrats is how they can zero in on a subject and get a group of people to vote just based on that. Here is an example. During the last presidential election there were some CNN reporters in Ohio talking to a bunch of voters. There were several of these peoplethat said they thought that Obama was the better candidate and that he would probably do a better job as president than McCain, but that they wouldn't vote for him because he was pro-choice. They felt that morally they could never vote for a pro-choice candidate. So they voted for McCain based on that one ideal.

Another thing they have done well is that they have turned the word liberal into a dirty word. In this country being called a liberal is a terrible thing. They then were able to convince a bunch of people that these horrible liberals would force their daughters to get pregnant while at school only to have them abort their babies three days before the due date. And it works. There is always a certain segment of the population that feels so strongly about one subject that they will vote for or against someone based solely on that subject the republicans have figured out how to tap into that.
The first paragraph you wrote is the idea of defining "framing" the debate in an emotional issue. Emotion trumps logic. This is the reason they vote against their own self interest. i.e. the emotion of the abortion issue trumps the logic of I think he will do a better job.

Liberals have long argued on the basis of logic not emotion. Crazy you would think it just the opposite but not so. Look at global warming as an issue. No amount of scientist saying it is real is going to win vs. job loss.

If you want better examples listen to this. It is fascinating. http://www.ad-traffic.com/lakoff.mp3
eZe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote