View Single Post
Old 09-27-2009, 04:08 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays View Post
if this industry ever pulled its head out of its ass and wrapped its mind around the fact that there are statutory damages for copyright violations of registered work.. there would be a lot less theft and a lot more profit from going after those damages.. (er... a lot less rogue employees, i mean)

if the content producers acted at the first signs of tube sites, they could have killed off the tube Moses baby sites... having their content copyrighted, filing DMCAs to these upstarts that didn't have a DMCA dept established, and would have slipped up and not complied... then strike with lawsuits.

But that didn't happen.... so baby Moses tube sites grew up with traffic, made revenue, and then started to pay attention to DMCA law, started to "legitimize" themselves by acquiring license for content as well as working with content producers to accept submissions from them, created their DMCA departments, etc.

so now, the big tube sites are here to lead the flock of freeloading porn surfers to the promise land of free porn.

it seems only the hand of DOJ could possiblely smite them down now for obscenity and 2257.

but all ye faithful in hoping the law/DOJ does the righteous thing, will have to wait for another burning bush to happen.

and now, moving on to non-biblical references......

there are many more tube sites that are and will pop-up to try and become a big tube star. so the diligence is needed even more now from content producers to protect their works and to take action.

Fight the porn testament!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote