Quote:
Originally Posted by Tickler
Wouldn't a ® watermark be more cost effective, have greater reach, and $$$ penalties.
|
that would be great, and content should be watermarked for those reasons.. but some sites that produce their own content, don't want the watermark, because its an obstruction/annoyance to have something on the frame.
also, some tube sites programmatically cut/crop the videos to remove watermarks. this would seem to make the copyright infringement case more substantive, because they are making a "derivative" work when they do the cut/crop.
---
put your watermarks in different locations throughout the clip and that will help you to get rid of the issue where watermarks are removed.... that is until some site uses some clever programming to analyze frames and detect watermarks in the frame and remove them.
Fight the never ending story!