Quote:
Originally Posted by Tickler
Wouldn't a ® watermark be more cost effective, have greater reach, and $$$ penalties.
1 ® > 1000s of ©
And they can be encoded/searchable in the files
|
You only get statutory penalties if the content is registered.
Quote:
|
it seems only the hand of DOJ could possiblely smite them down now for obscenity and 2257.
|
If the tube site doesnt upload the content, then they do not have to comply with 2257.
Which we know doesnt happen but there is a loop hole in the new regs for social networking sites that might apply to tubes.