Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrah
There was also the Michael Irving case. Oh wait, he has money and is a celebrity. So no one cares. Wasn't that also the case when police arrived, they saw the rape victim banging on a window screaming for help as they arrived in a room where she had been locked in? Wasn't that also the case where she dropped charges and implicated herself by saying she lied all so the death threats and harassment against her would stop??
|
Once again you present unsubstantiated information. According to news reports the woman in question recanted her story after THE POLICE presented EVIDENCE THAT NO ATTACK OCCURRED. But I suppose that was all a conspiracy perpetrated by the "brotherhood" of police because surely the fairer sex isn't capable of despicable behavior unlike their male counterpart! Of course, you've overlooked my main point -- that women can be devious and deceitful just as much as men can be abusive and controlling.
It's painfully obvious that you have a powerful bias against men and you'd much rather believe allegations against them, with undue gullibility, even when better judgment should steer you otherwise. You assert a woman's unsubstantiated claims of abuse, and yet in the same breath you'd dare assume that any rebuttal from the male party would be an attack on the aforementioned woman and as such should not be sought.
You admit that this is just something you do in you spare time, and I am very thankful for that. You admit that you're not a journalist, and I believe that goes without saying. The only thing you won't admit is that your blog is an anti-male porn gossip rag and isn't worth a passing glance.
This will be my last post in this thread as I'm confident I've sufficiently illustrated your wayward reasoning, your transparent prejudice, and your willful ignorance of the two. Have fun with whatever it is you're trying to accomplish, and I sincerely hope that one day you're sued into oblivion when your agenda steps on the wrong toes.
