Quote:
Originally Posted by CC
Post count doesn't mean much, sure. But most people who have been around for a while (I think I count as someone who's been around the adult net for eons but mostly lurks, which is who you are referring to) have made least 100 or so posts over the years. I didn't say 10,000 posts. It would eliminate more "bad" people than "good" people. Just look at the post counts in this thread.
|
I've seen many people with reg dates of 2001 and are very big time in the industry with less then 50 posts...
Quote:
Originally Posted by papagmp
Lock it down to those that actually own copy-right material and those that are actively involved in the protection of it. If an applicant can't prove he/she/it own anything that is at risk - or provides a service to protect such content, let them sit outside till they can.
These are a few of the obvious candidates:
1: program owners
2: producers
3: talent
4: editors
5: people actively involved or that own services that protect content
To be honest - just being an affiliate, imo, is not in itself enough to qualify someone for this discussion - any more than just being a board member. After all, we all know how hard it is to sign up for the average program.  |
And it's the affiliates who will build more tubes because they are being pushed out because you think their opinion doesn't matter. Way to make more problems!