Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
For merely taking pictures and maintaining the website he has been charged as though he owned and profited from the site. He was merely an IC.
|
Isn't maintaining a site that is used for prostitution, sex for money, different from running a porn site, private viewing of legal content?
Sounds like he was part of an on-going illegal business. If he was being paid then he was part of the operation. This is much different than simply taking legal photos of women then selling them.
Freedom of speech and selling whores really have nothing in common do they?
.
.