Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink
Isn't maintaining a site that is used for prostitution, sex for money, different from running a porn site, private viewing of legal content?
Sounds like he was part of an on-going illegal business. If he was being paid then he was part of the operation. This is much different than simply taking legal photos of women then selling them.
Freedom of speech and selling whores really have nothing in common do they?
.
.
|
agreed.
i also don't believe it's in the industry's best interest to try and use an accused organized crime ring's prostitution case to lead the way for a 1st amendment fight for pornography.
that's a way bad idea.