Quote:
Originally Posted by sortie
My take on that is that because the video tape was evidence of the sobriety test it can't
be ruled out of evidence so the jury will hear the statements made at that time.
So it's up to the jury as to how much the statements mean.
The jury saw the entire video tape in this case.
|
I think a lot depends on how they got the video tape. If he gave it to them or it was in the car or something it would be easy to use it as evidence. If it was given to them by someone else or they searched his house and got it, he might have been able to fight it.
Either way, IMO, anyone who drives drunk deserves any and all punishment they get and then some.