Quote:
Originally Posted by DavieVegas
I guess it depends on how you feel about 18 year old girls. i mean im 29, so 18 year old girls don't feel like jail bait to me. Stolen ex gf content from myspace of little girls under 18 def makes me sick. Here is the true question that is the problem with this niche. Why would I shoot exclusively for this niche lets say? Why would i offer anything more then $100 for these kind of low grade self shot pics? It really does not make sense pictures wise but videos, I do believe need to be exclusive. I would not want to pay $100 or more for this type of content. I am not shooting them in high rez or HD video you know? If you are shooting for all of those then it makes sense.
|
I'm 25, and I would throw it to any 18 year old who wanted it. Hell i don't even have a problem saying that a 16-17 year old girl is cute when i see when who is. Whatever. This niche spawned out of the popularity of free jailbait sites though, there's no denying that. The first sites in the niche were simply scrapings from sites and forums dedicated to jailbait, where age is well, hard to determine. If some little highschool chick wants to take pictures of herself in her underwear and throw it on the net, that's one thing, but when someone decides they're going to take those pictures and turn around and sell them in a on porn sites, there is something wrong with that. Some of the girls I see on these tours and shit don't look like they could pass for 16-17 even, really. I respect the fact that there are people and programs approaching this new niche legally, but with all the other bullshit tied into the niche, I just can't go forit myself. Especially when even the legal sites promote their content in a way that suggests that it is stolen, scraped, and used as revenge. In a way it's a little bit disturbing how well it's all converting. I guess it's really no different than teen niche porn, just sort of a melding of amateur and teen niches. ijust don't like the wrapper that's been put on it all.
As far as paying for "low quality" images. If it is turning a huge profit, and that is what needs to be paid to obtain legal content in the format and style that is converting, isn't that a reasonable price to pay? Perhaps the quality is not always measured in resolution.