Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
Yes you are so right. The Constitution of the United States is just semantics... what was I thinking.... Cant really argue with that.
What losing side ? I'm not Paul's attorney. And since I have taken an oath to support and defend the Constitution, if I am on the losing side again, then we are all on the losing side.
Its interesting that you say that since I have a double major in Criminal Justice and Psychology, taught by then current and former FBI agents, and wrote a 180 page thesis on the case studies of 5 serial killers that was read and graded by the former head of the Behavioral Sciences Unit for the FBI at Quantico Virgina. And I can tell you that each serial killer has a different story to tell. You have to look a little beyond the surface to find the truth.
|
Good points, but plesurepays has a serious dislike for Max hardcore. Nothing you intelligently point out will make him see anything other than Max did it and he is being punished rightfully for it.
What pleasurepays does not get is that Max is getting punished under a bad ruling due to a very poor interpretation of the obscenity law.
This poor law interpretation and bad ruling has serious consequence for the adult industry down the road, if it is not over turned.
Im cool with Max getting jail time for assault and battery or even rape(if the facts support it). I really dont give a shit what happens to the guy. But i do care when Max gets his civil liberties taken away.
WHY DO I CARE?? Because if his can be taken away, so can mine.
You need to look at this case for the facts and without your personal feelings about Max Hardcore. If you can do that, you will really see what a travesty this case decision really is.
