View Single Post
Old 11-19-2009, 09:30 AM  
NBBCash Matze
Confirmed User
 
NBBCash Matze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
are you going to believe the person that posted this without actually READING what has been passed or using LOGIC?


Let me use a brighter shade of crayon for the confused ones.

TVs are becoming more and more efficient every year. By the time this law take effect only the most cheap ass POS TVs will not be in compliance. Why would you want one of those anyways.


Just because this tard doesn't think it's possible doesn't mean it's not. Now if improvements cause power cosumption to drop 23% every 18 months by 2013 that 293 watt TV will only only use 173 watts. 2 watts under the law.


Also TV using less power means less drain on the electrical grid which means less power pants needed. Guess who would have paid for those new power plants that needed to be built Einsteins?



My math says that's $225 for every man woman and child in California. You don't like saving money?
thx but I've read the article before I posted my answer.
Why, because I already own my plasma since 1 year, it's a great TV and I don't want to buy a newer TV before the old one is broken... Because I am so satisfied with my TV that I would buy the same again in few years (if there will be a shop that still sells these).
And no as long as electricity is affordable I would use my 480watt TV (but never mind, I don't live in california) .. and no Iam not so confused as you maybe think GatorB thx
__________________
-= NBBCash - 30+ Sites To Promote - Up To 70% RevShare - 10% Webmster Referral =-
Products:BurningTicket, Hot MILF Porn Site, JugTicket Tools: FHGs, Banners, Tubeclips, RSS, etc.
contact: ICQ 551-331-470 or matthias[at]nbbcash.com
NBBCash Matze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote