Quote:
Originally Posted by will76
right you wont be charged for not having "2257" if they don't have a law on the books for it, but the problem isn't getting a 2257 violation, its getting arressted for cp and not having age docs on file to prove your innocence. If they don't require 2257 type laws and the individual then decides not to carry age docs because he feels its not required, if he gets accused of cp he is screwed since he cant prove it.
The above situation is for a primary producer, what if you are an affiliate and the company says they have 2257 (age docs) but their country doesn't require it so they basically lie to you and just say they have it, then you get arrested for cp, try to contact that company for help and they say "opps".
BTW, in some countries people get killed for missunderstandings by the police  |
They can arrest you, but without 2257 requirements or similar, then the burden of proof is not yours. Sure, documents available right away would put an end to that situation, but I would still say it's bad police work if they only base their charges on assumptions. That can't be used in courts.
I would also expect some co-operation accross borders, when dealing with such serious accusations. For instance, if a payserve model was "cleared", why the hell waist time on hunting affiliates if they already know her age in Europe vice versa? I bet Interpol and FBI has bigger databases than any affiliate or program, but they are not going to tell us that
