I think what is *really* being said here is that the GFY advertisers (and Dave says they are in agreement) ... They want more value for their advertising dollars. Advertisers clearly do not feel they are getting what they're paying for, and that's a big problem.
If GFY is seriously interested in segregating non-advertiser announcements, and only allow paid advertisers to have free speech... yikes. Trying to implement that and then moderate it sounds like a nightmare.
There are many better ways to create value for your existing clients. Rotating skins, FPA's, etc for long-term clients .. so they get something every x-months for remaining a loyal client. GFY needs to keep these folks happy without pissing off the other 95%.
__________________
Jay | JuicyAds Founder
Businessman of the Year [YNOT Awards 2013]

The most awarded adult advertising network with 25+ XBIZ, GFY, and YNOT Awards.
|