View Single Post
Old 11-30-2009, 12:55 PM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrkMStanz View Post
you misunderstand as well

I do understand copyright infringement vs theft - I well know the difference - I have read the laws as best I could due to many discussions with giddyboy - I am now at the point where I figure I have read more than I ever should have had to.

do not assume that I do not "understand something so simple and basic like COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT"

do not assume that I don't know the difference between stealing a physical product and copying a digital product.

do not assume that I do not protect myself and my copyrighted content as best I can with the tools that are available.

BUT

I advocate change
I advocate that digital property attain the same status and protection as the 'hard' goods enjoy
I advocate a global recognition of copyright holders rights
I advocate a global Law/Treaty recognizing copyright holders rights
I advocate that a global body be created to draw up and enforce a new way



copyright laws started when there were only hard goods - and only "hard good" ways to 'copy' (books, art, etc)

copyright laws evolved when tapes were used for music, and cable TV came about allowing for a good quality copy (giddyboys VCR arguments) - they were created under the assumption that a copy would be a physical product made from a broadcast signal - and made provisions for private 'fair use'

copyright laws evolved again (more fair use expansions - DMCA - etc) when the Internet/CDs/DVDs happened - but they did not envision the rampant copying that would happen - they were modified at that time to handle a low volume of 'mistakes' and protect large corporations from liability when they accidentally used a copyrighted image

now I believe that it is time that they evolve again - to stop the rampant nature of 'copying' and distribution that the 'new' Internet infrastucture allows.



get that? - "I believe" and "I advocate" and indeed "I argue for, at length, on the Internet forums" are all my right to free speech - and I shall continue to exercise those rights for what I believe in. Just as you, giddyboy, and everyone else has their right to.

I don't tell giddyboy to stop his plans - to do something else with his business model. I will lay out my thoughts on it - I will try and convince him, he will try and convince me - its all good.

If you don't like it feel free to continue to voice your opinion - I will continue to read it.

but don't ever assume you know what I do and do not know or understand.

k?

the problem with your entire tirade is you ignore the fact that these new technologies produced new INCOME streams for the copyright holders

when they generated new fair use they were balanced

Torrents/peer to peer has the same balanced transaction

just becuase you are to clueless to see the income source doesn't invalidate the new fair use rights (access shifting) or the extension of the old rights to the new medium (timeshifting, backup , recovery)
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote