Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
I looked at a few of the reviews and the concept is awesome. Finding out about the "problem" sites can do nothing but good to the industry. My small criticism is it's a webmasters review rather than a porn buyers review. No where did I see a review of the porn quality of the content. They need to download some of the videos and see how good they are to the porn buyer ie the videos wank ability.
Without that it's like a restaurant review without tasting the meal.
Still an improvement on many review sites, the girl at the beginning gets a bit repetitive after a while.
The true test of the site will be how many of the viewers come back for their next sign up. Getting new traffic is good, keeping it buying is best.
|
I noticed some of that too. He would download the movie, just to see how fast the download speed was then close it. There was no comment on if the content was any good or not nor was there any mention of the video quality. Of course I only watched a few reviews, maybe he does that on some of the other reviews.
If I were going to a review site I want to know if the site has in it what the tour promises, but I also want to know if the movies and pictures are any good.