Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
You served yourself AGAIN. You come on here and try to spin and spin and spin. And I just laugh at it. And this time I took just a few minutes to prove you wrong again...and you are back to spinning that to try and avoid the fact that you were WRONG. Disney did NOT do what you said and YES they did make those movies with EXACTLY what the founding fathers of MY country had in mind. I know you are an expert sitting up there in Canada in your parent's basement...but damn gideon. I guess you are starting to lose your grip as you see that your "business plan" that centered around stolen content isn't gonna work after all.
|
disney did not take the origial cupidena myth and create there own original story
they took the derived work of the story of hans christian anderson (along with snow white, sleeping beauty and dozens of other stories) to make their stories.
The fact that stories can be traced back to the ancient greeks doesn't change the fact they used the Derived version HCA
IT also doesn't change the fact that the currently it impossible to do that same thing with disney property of micky mouse, even fan fiction feature that characters is considered illegal
and each time a copyright is just about to expire , they just change the law and tack on another 20 years, creating a situation where we will never be able to do what disney built their empire on (taking public domain content and deriving an new interpretion) with their properties.
the really funny part is your own statement contridict yourself since your basically arguing that disney has a right to keep copyright (in revolving perpetuity) on their beauty and the beast, because the original beauty and the beast was derivied from greek metholody story of cupid.
had the law exist in it current form when HCA wrote his version disney would not have had the right to build then empire they did.