Quote:
Originally Posted by arock10
1 and 7 are directly related as gallery submitters have been hurt by old skool tgps getting fucking owned
So I'd say 1 & 7 have lost a lot more money over all compared to little paysite program owners (#5) cause I doubt their profits are anywhere close to 1&7 combined if totaled.
Anyway - gallery submitters can now become tube submitters and small paysite programs can directly market with tubes (exgf sites, etc - sure revenues may be lower but if you get to keep 100% by cutting out affiliates it can still work).
So really I'd vote for #7 cause they are fucked. Hope they saved up back in 1999
|
Gallery submissions to tube sites is a whole different ball game, I don't see a model for affiliates to be able to submit to tube sites unless they used bought content licensed for use on tubes and not their own tube. Highly doubtfull any content broker would sell a license like that. But paysite owners having exclusive content hell they can do whatever they want with their own content. If I owned a paysite with a lot of content hell I would just contact the tubes and say fuck it heres my vids use them only with a link back to me, in fact here I'll make you a player with my watermark linked to my site. Then I would make my own tube site using my content to promote my paysite and sell add spots to dating and cam sites. If I can make moeny promoting dating sites and cam sites with my paysites content why not? Protecting my content from tubes and making people pay for it is not gonna increase my signups at my paysite. There are many different ways to skin a cat.