fmltube

What evidence do you need? Kelsie's birthday is April 6, 1990. The production was filmed end of summer 2007 and placed into rotation December 2007. It remained on his site until last December 2008 when the story broke which Dirty D removed immediately and then claimed to be the victim in all of this. You claim that you cannot trust industry sources such as Gene Ross yet we are supposed to believe Dirty D's story on the very site the story was broke on. You can check the Internet archives and see exactly when her content appeared on Dirty D's site. He thought by deleting her from the site that all traces were gone but he forgot about the "Way Back Machine."

This isn't a matter of trying to bring an industry down, just a scumbag to justice. There are a ton of people in adult who do the right thing everyday and follow the law. The law states you cannot under any circumstances use a model under the age of 18, married or not. Dirty D has been accused of this and instead of coming out in the beginning and coming clean, he deflected it and transferred blame on the girl.

Now, IF and that's a BIG IF, what Dirty D claims is actually true and she purposely and knowingly used a fake ID and Dirty D has NO KNOWLEDGE of such ID, it is still his responsibility being in an adult business where one fuck up can not only cost you your business but also your freedom and the freedom of those marketing for you to make sure everything meets the requirements.

But looking at the way he response was worded, he was trying to absolve himself from any wrong doing while shifting the burden of proof on that girl. Furthermore, IF Kelsie was actually lying about this entire ordeal, where is the defamation lawsuit against her from Dirty D? Surely if she is the predator in this situation and has caused such harm to his character and business, he would want justice for himself would he not? He knows that any such action would open a jury to all of his shady practices that have since came out as well as the events leading up and including the production of Kelsey when she was 17 years old. If they can convict Max on distributing content that he did not send himself in Tampa, what chance do you think Dirty D stands in the same Tampa court room?

Dirty D can always post a copy of the ID that Kelsie used with redacted information and let those who question whether he acted in good faith to make the determination if the picture ID looks anything similar to the girl he shot. I bet there is a reason why this has not occurred.