|
I think the prosecutors claims against her were weak. The local media did a good job of persecuting her before the trial. The evidence seems to be either all circumstantial or a fantastic story dreamed up by the prosecution. Like the killing based on a comic book or how it was a sex orgy gone wrong or strange behavior at the police station or buying underwear (after not being able to retrieve her own).
Buying bleach the morning after and the police finding bleach was used to remove blood in the house, yes ironic but there's no proof she was the one using it to clean up the blood. A kitchen knife with Knox's DNA on the handle found in her boyfriends home with trace amounts of unidentifiable DNA on it that didn't even match the murder wounds, shouldn't have been an issue in court.
The detectives were the ones who mentioned Lumumba after finding she texted him that night. They then asked her to "imagine" what could have happened if the evidence said she did it, and she gave them a story to get out of the interrogation which she said they hit her during it.
More importantly there has been absolutely no DNA ever found linking Knox to the room where Kercher was murdered.
Just like everyone else I don't know if she did it or not, but from looking at the evidence I wouldn't be able to convict her.
__________________
Traffic-Out
We sell quality text link clicked traffic
|