View Single Post
Old 12-19-2009, 09:21 PM  
sortie
Confirmed User
 
sortie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dood View Post
I think the prosecutors claims against her were weak. The local media did a good job of persecuting her before the trial. The evidence seems to be either all circumstantial or a fantastic story dreamed up by the prosecution. Like the killing based on a comic book or how it was a sex orgy gone wrong or strange behavior at the police station or buying underwear (after not being able to retrieve her own).

Buying bleach the morning after and the police finding bleach was used to remove blood in the house, yes ironic but there's no proof she was the one using it to clean up the blood. A kitchen knife with Knox's DNA on the handle found in her boyfriends home with trace amounts of unidentifiable DNA on it that didn't even match the murder wounds, shouldn't have been an issue in court.

The detectives were the ones who mentioned Lumumba after finding she texted him that night. They then asked her to "imagine" what could have happened if the evidence said she did it, and she gave them a story to get out of the interrogation which she said they hit her during it.

More importantly there has been absolutely no DNA ever found linking Knox to the room where Kercher was murdered.

Just like everyone else I don't know if she did it or not, but from looking at the evidence I wouldn't be able to convict her.
All true!

I see all that too.

But that foot print that they claim matches Sollecito's shoes just blows me away.



That's a match to me and with all the other circumstances it's hard to deny.

Every time I look at the people involved; I'm like "This trial is a scam!!"
But I've been looking up the evidence and it's all there!

I figure like this,

I can say each one of these :

- the shoe print is not exact
- buying bleach at 7:45AM is normal when you don't even flush your shit.
- the DNA on the knife is flawed
- the size 7 foot prints in luminol are not from blood
- the foot print directions don't make sense to me, as if any of it did.
- the sole killer tracked blood into the bathroom but floated in mid-air in the hall
- no cleaning happened, but 200 fingerprints were found but only one from Amanda
even though she lived there for a month
- Sollecito's DNA on the bra clasp was contamination by someone who had his
DNA on a glove and ignore that, even if true, the DNA would still only get on his glove
from something in the murder room anyway.
- etc....


I can say all of that one statement at at time but when I look at it all together
she is guilty.
__________________
sortie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote