Quote:
Originally Posted by Twisted Dave
Well, I disagree with your comments. A photo is not only as good as it's subject... that's the attitude a lot of people who claim to be photographers are taking, and 90% of those people can't shoot for shit. A photo is as good as itself, and within the eye of the beholder. And since I am using my eyes, in my opinion, Dean's work is exceptional.  But each to their own. I don't dismiss your opinion. I just don't agree is all. |
Ok let me set you straight about your lame eye for real properly exposed photography.
Dean shoots mostly for the highlights, a tad to much. Stephan Hicks is far superior to Dean by far!
Now about your being able to still see the models skin texture, you need a new monitor i see,
Look at her tattoo, it is so photo shopped out so much, it look ridiculous. Faded and a huge mistake in PS work.
Kayden is HOT indeed, do you think Dean could make a pile of dog shit look good?
Seriously go outside and shoot dog shit, then come back and tell me that a photo is not as good as it subject.
Stephan Hicks Vs. Dean Capture