Quote:
Originally Posted by theking
And once again you prove not to be the sharpest knife in the drawer and yet you are all over this board...no matter the subject..dispensing your words of wisdom. He clearly stated that he does not have the patent...thus he is not spending any money on a patent attorney. Please show us your law degree so when you accuse him of making a "libelous threat" we are aware that you at least have some credibility to be speaking about what constitutes a "libelous threat".
i understand stupidity. i mean, i understand that not everyone can be an astronaut.
but i just can't understand sometimes why people feel the necessity to broadcast the fact that they are both incompetent and stupid.
i'm kind of enjoying this. its like a light snack before bedtime.
|
its very simple you retarded old fake suicide committing fuck. patent law is about what can be proven in court. you are not violating a patent or someones purported rights until a court says you are or you admit you are. proclaiming it to be fact, doesn't make it fact and proving it to be fact can take many years... while filing a civil suit against him for making such false claims takes considerably less time and costs considerably less money.
i don't know how to help you understand that. take a calendar.. color the first 60 days in yellow, which is about how much time it would take to serve him and crush him in court - then buy 4 more calendars and color everyday of those in orange and put a big number at the end of those 1200 + days - say a random, mid 6 figures in USD and that's what it will take to proven patent infringement.
i didn't say HE was spending anything. I'm saying - that all has to happen BEFORE what is today only a "claim" - becomes a recorded fact.
you see... you can't accuse someone of something and attempt to damage their business, business relationships, income, customers/webmasters, attack/defame their character without opening yourself up to civil liability unless its proven true. it can't be proven true BEFORE Brad could PROVE he did say these things.
Got it?
Make any sense dumbass? do you need pictures, drawings? change of diapers? how can i help?
going to a public forum, full of your would be advertisers, to announce that the markets leader in the product you hope to promote is "going down soon" and accusing them of patent infringement... subsequently accusing any and all webmasters promoting fast size of contributory patent infringement (his own potential webmasters) isn't exactly a genius move... and it brings in a whole lot of other legal questions about the validity of the remarks (which are claims - not facts), unfair business practices etc etc etc
further, the guy is so fucking dumb, that he's claiming that he's been "in talks" for over a year to discuss launching and promoting a product to webmasters and in this time has clearly done zero market research, was totally unaware of the markets largest player and has proven conclusively that he's incompetent to the point of being a danger to himself and those around him.
so.. i fully understand how you instantly felt some sort of kinship with him. Maybe he's faked the death on ynot or JBM of his adopted father Land Cruiser or Uncle Suburban or his cousin, Jeep Wrangler. You should look into that.
i understand how all of the obvious problems here escape you. it does require some capacity for reason and logic and sadly for you, some small amount of intelligence.
In your honor, lets add a REAL dead Pathfinder to this thread.
