Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
Alright, now that we are done horsing around. DudeRick is unbanned.
No I am not fucking around.
|
Eric, can you clarify something please -
this new rule #4 states:
Quote:
|
Excessive harassment or verbal abuse of a single member, will be be grounds for a warning. Inciting others to harass or verbally abuse a member will also generate the same warning. Repeated violation after warning will result in the ban hammer!
|
Yet the two times this has been directly tested, it resulted in a banning.
Do we have to walk on eggshells around here from now on, hoping not to touch anyone's feelings for fear of being banned immediately? People have enemies, and are always going to have a stab at them, whether it's spaced by weeks or not, it's still repetitive abuse.
So does all one have to do make a collective list of posts showing repetitive abuse by a single and send it off to the mods to get someone banned?
Or is it a warning-based system?
In any case, it really does seem biased toward molly-coddling the cry babies imo.