View Single Post
Old 02-07-2010, 11:19 PM  
xenigo
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo View Post
they see a dean dof shot and think they must do a dof shot, with little regard to the context or audience or what it takes to put together such a picture, let alone video.

thus the original pic having 1/2 a head shot and a crazy tight dof. it's hard to get this shot right, especially with a camera lacking dof preview. but here we are discussing dof as a porn shot.
I see all this talk about "DOF shots" and all I'm thinking is "what the fuck are you talking about?". I think what you're referring to is shallow DOF taken with a lenses with a large aperature and large sensor, versus the "deep DOF" that you would see with a camera shooting with a small sensor and small aperature.

For the record, although Dean is a great photographer, and his work is fantastic, this isn't something Dean invented or even made popular. Canon and Nikon have a whole range of lenses and cameras who's whole purpose is allow a more shallow DOF.

I see several of you mentioning that you think images taken with a shallow DOF are unnatural, or something that surfers are not savvy to. Shallow DOF images actually mimic the human eye. Put your finger in front of your eye at a far distance, and take note of the background. Now, move your finger in front of your eye at a close distance. Do you see the background become more blurry? This is exactly what the lens does. This isn't a "trick" or a "novelty"... this is just how lenses work... both the lenses in your camera AND the lenses in your eyes.
xenigo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote