Quote:
Originally Posted by The Demon
Think about it this way. The Vikings completely owned the Saints in virtually every category and needed 4 fumbles and an interception to lose. Brett Favre had 470 yards to Manning's under 300. It REALLY makes you question if Manning is even better than Favre at this point, because this was supposed to be Manning's coronation as the greatest ever. Now I'm wondering how badly the Vikings might have beaten the Colts had they made it to the Super Bowl. I bet because of this game, Favre will come back.
|
lmao... how can you compare how two players performed against the same team when you bitched and bitched to me because I was comparing how the colts and saints played against the patriots...
:O h crap
Looks like the comparison I gave turned out to be a good guage. Colts should have lost to the Patriots, the Saints blew them out. The Saints handled the Colts.
BTW, where the hell do you get your stats from:
Farve: 28-46, 310 yards, 1 TD, and 2 INTs
Manning: 31-45, 333 yards 1TD, 1INT
Manning played better than Farve.... Farve 470 yards? Manning not over 300? wtf ????
One thing you got right, the vikings are a better team than the Colts and would have beat them too. We played the cream of the crop 2 weeks ago, not last night. When the colts were busy coming from behind to beat Sanchez and the JETS lol. The Saints were battling with a top team like the vikings.