View Single Post
Old 02-18-2010, 02:03 PM  
EdgeXXX
Confirmed User
 
EdgeXXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Secretely plotting a hostile takeover
Posts: 5,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdc-Loki View Post
I skimmed the 'manifesto' am I right that according to him, the tax laws state that he was NOT required to pay taxes cause of what he did for a living???

IF that's the case don't we all fall under that lovely 'law'

-Loki-
No, from what I understand Section 1706 is more like a "double jeopardy" indemnification tax clause where the taxes of the contractor are paid by the contractor and AGAIN by the company that hired them (along with a ton of hoops and loopholes). Thus making companies hesitant in hiring contractors.

http://answers.google.com/answers/th...id/784959.html
__________________
.
.
.
.

I have a sig
EdgeXXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote