You're such an idiot.
The chances of you finding a post from two random, separate people within 60 seconds of one another is ridiculous.
Barefooties posts an average of 15.76 times a day.
BlackWidow posts an avearge of 0.37 times a day.
Now, from 12:00 AM to 11:59 PM, there are a total of 3599 minutes (obviously with stuff like working hours/timezones etc, this changes, but it's close enough) for someone to make a post on GFY. That means that there are 7198 possible chances of these guys posting at the same time if they both average 1 post a day. On the other end of the scale?
12,952,801 possible chances of them making a post and not coinciding. However, seeing as Black Widow posts once every 3 days, and Barefooties posts 45 times every 3 days. We can now work out what the chances are of one of Barefooties posts crossing over @ BlackWidow's.
(12,952,801 x 3)/45 = 863,520:1 (Which ironically enough is the current conversation ratio of YesSignals.com)
Now, using basic binomial probability with the following parameters:
Probability of success=1.15805 x 10^-6 (This is the % chance of one of Barefooties' posts coming in to contact with BlackWidow's)
Num trial = 380 (Total number of BlackWidow's posts)
Number of successes = >/1 (We only need 1 post for him to be found *innocent*
Probability = 0.0004399
Percent chance = 0.04%
My maths isn't completely accurate but there's no need to be, you can see that the chances of this event occurring randomly is completely unrealistic.
And your post is also structured in a way to suggest a false dichotomy. If no two posts are found next to each other you prove absolutely nothing. The very notion that this shows "proof of guilt" is fucking absurd.
Just to show the idiocy of your post, Barefootsies and BlackWidow would have to post for another 6,000 years at their current rate to have a 30% chance of this type of event occurring.
That being said, has anyone found two crossover posts yet?
