Quote:
Originally Posted by mayabong
I know it was one of the least damaged buildings .. also WTC 4 5 6 were also damaged.
The official story is it collapsed by fire... thats about all they say about that building in the comission report. If that was the case it still wouldn't come down so perfectly. Either way there are like 2000 other unanswered questions. Thats just the tip of the iceberg.. I definately know it wasn't some guy in a cave, if you believe that you are a victim of the media bigtime. Seems like they had this story ready to go like 3 hours after towers collapsed. Look at what america has done since sept 11.. they couldn't have done this craziness if that didn't happen.. it was perfectly planned and executed and the nation went along with it.
|
No, I'm serious. Nobody seems to have any good information on the subject. I've seen statements that 25 miles away they registered 2.1+ magnitude on the richter scale which means it would have been about the same, maybe a bit more right on the site.
Clearly the fire damage story is nonsense, but to brush off foreign responsibility is plain stupid. People use that 'guy hiding in a cave' line to attempt to dumb down the enemy. The 'guy who was hiding in a cave' was responsible for other attacks on US assets and has access to an obscene amount of Saudi funds. Is it possible that people within the administration new something was coming and chose to do nothing about it? Sure, its possible. Was it an inside job? Doubtful.