Quote:
Originally Posted by ShellyCrash
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see where PornLaw is putting himself out there and making any claims regarding the guilt or innocence of anyone involved.
I think since arrests have been made it's probably safe to assume the state has some pretty clear evidence she was under 18 years of age at the time the content was produced.
The question at hand is who knew her age and when.  |
He made claims previously that his service would prevent this.
He claim nobody know if the content was removed, when there is public statements available 1+ year ago stating it was removed.
The same statement contain information that the model in question used a fake id.
He as a lawyer state:
1: Nobody know if it was removed
2: His service would have prevented this
Both statements is incorrect and false, it is statements made with the intend to promote his own service.
His statement is a public free legal advise since he appear under his business identity as an attorney, which make him liable as an attorney.
That's the reason for questioning his lawyers insurance
__________________
PM me for Press related consulting work.
Good PR / Bad PR / PR / Articles / Headliners
When results matters morals comes second
